Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°ú´ëÇлýÀÇ »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎÀÇ ½É¹ÌÀû ¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼® ¹× Àνĵµ Æò°¡

Analysis of esthetic factors and evaluation of esthetic perception for maxillary anteriors of dental students

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 57±Ç 2È£ p.118 ~ 126
±è¼±°æ, ±è¿Á¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¼±°æ ( Kim Seon-Kyung ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø
±è¿Á¼ö ( Kim Ok-Su ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½É¹ÌÀû ¿ä¼Òµé¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Á¶»çÇÏ°í ³²³à °£ Â÷ÀÌ ¹× °³ÀÎ ½É¹ÌÀû Àνĵµ¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â Áö¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: Ä¡ÁÖÀûÀ¸·Î °Ç°­ÇÑ 25 - 35¼¼ÀÇ Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø»ý 70¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î »ó¾Ç ¸ðÇüÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´°í µðÁöÅÐ Ä«¸Þ¶ó¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ »çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÏ°í °èÃø ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ÀÇ ±Ù¡¤¿ø½É ÃÖ´ë ½Ã°¢Àû Æø°æ°ú Ä¡Àº Á¤Á¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷Àû À§Ä¡, ÁßÀýÄ¡ÀÇ ÃÖ´ë ³ôÀ̸¦ °èÃøÇÏ¿´°í ÁßÀýÄ¡ÀÇ Ä¡°ü ÇüŸ¦ ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀÇ ½É¹Ì Àνĵµ Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇØ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Åë°èºÐ¼®Àº SPSS programÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ ½Ã°¢Àû Æø°æ ºñÀ²ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿ìÃøÀº 1.38:1:0.78, ÁÂÃøÀº 1.41:1:0.81ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀ» °¡Á³°í Ȳ±Ý ºñÀ²°ú´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÁßÀýÄ¡°üÀÇ Æø°æ ´ë Àå°æ ºñÀ²ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿ìÃøÀº 0.84, ÁÂÃøÀº 0.83ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀ» °¡Á³´Ù. Ä¡Àº Á¤Á¡ÀÇ À§Ä¡ÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁßÀýÄ¡´Â ¿ø½ÉÃø, ÃøÀýÄ¡´Â Áß½É, °ßÄ¡´Â ¿ø½ÉÃø¿¡ ÁÖ·Î À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ ½Ã°¢Àû Æø°æ ºñÀ², ÁßÀýÄ¡ Æø°æ ´ë Àå°æ ºñÀ², Ä¡Àº Á¤Á¡ À§Ä¡, Ä¡°ü ÇüÅÂ, ¹Ì¼Ò½Ã Ä¡Àº ³ëÃâ Á¤µµ´Â ³²³à °£ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú°í ÀÌ·± ¿ä¼Òµé°ú ¾È¸ðÀÇ ÇüÅÂ¿Í Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀÇ ½É¹ÌÀû Àνĵµ¿Í´Â °ü·Ã¼ºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀº »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ ½Ã°¢Àû Æø°æÀÇ È²±ÝºñÀ² ¹× ÁßÀýÄ¡ Ä¡°üÀÇ ÀÌ»óÀû Æø°æ ´ë Àå°æ ºñÀ²°ú´Â ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÁö¸¸ »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ ½É¹Ì¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ½É¹ÌÀû ÀνÄÀº Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀÇ ¼öÄ¡È­µÈ °´°üÀû ÁöÇ¥º¸´Ù´Â ÁÖ°üÀû ÆÇ´ÜÀÌ ´õ Áß¿äÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

Purpose: This research is to investigate factors that affect dental aesthetics and analyze whether individual perception affects and difference of genders affects the esthetic factors.

Materials and methods: Seventy dental students of Chonnam University aged from 25 to 35 years old without periodontal problems were included. Maxillary dental cast for participants were made, and standardized photo was taken with a digital camera. Maximum visual width and the position of gingival zenith of maxillary anterior teeth and maximum height of the maxillary central incisors were measured by a measurement program and the shape of central incisor was categorized. Questionnaire was conducted to evaluate esthetic perception. SPSS program was used to perform statistical analysis.
Results: The average visual width ratio of right maxillary anteriors was 1.38:1:0.78 and 1.41:1:0.81 for the left which differ from the golden ratio. The width to height ratio for right and left central incisor was 0.84 and 0.83 respectively. The gingival zenith position was determined to be: mostly, central incisors and canines were located in the distal side, lateral incisors were located in the center. The visual width ratio of right maxillary anterior teeth, ratio of width to height of central incisor, gingival zenith position, crown morphology and amounts of gingival exposure upon smiling were not significantly different between genders, and facial patterns and these dental esthetic factors were not related to aesthetic perception.
Conclusion: Even though participants had the visual width ratio of maxillary anteriors or ideal width to ideal height of central incisors that did not agree with the golden ratio, they had high satisfaction for dental esthetics. Esthetic perception depends more on subjective judgements of participants than objective indices.

Å°¿öµå

½É¹Ì¼º; »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ; Ȳ±ÝºñÀ²; Àνĵµ
Esthetic; Maxillary anterior teeth; Golden proportion; Perception

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed